Everyone says “put 20% down to avoid PMI.” Financial gurus preach it. Real estate agents recommend it. Lenders incentivize it with better rates.
But when I used down payment calculators to model my specific situation, the math showed something unexpected: 10% down with PMI was better for my financial wellness than 20% down.
Yes, I’m paying $192/month in PMI ($23,040 over 10 years). But keeping $42,000 in liquid savings instead of putting it all toward my down payment gave me financial flexibility worth far more than the PMI cost.
Here’s the complete calculator analysis, real-world scenarios where the extra cash saved me, and why PMI isn’t always the enemy—especially for young buyers building wealth.
My Home Purchase and Down Payment Decision
Home details:
- Purchase price: $420,000
- Closing costs: $9,800
- Move-in expenses: $3,500
- Total cash needed: $433,300 + down payment
My savings:
- Total saved: $89,000
- Emergency fund goal: $18,000 (6 months expenses)
- Investment account: $12,000 (don’t want to liquidate)
- Available for down payment: $59,000 (comfortable)
Two down payment scenarios:
Option A: 20% down (no PMI)
- Down payment: $84,000
- Closing costs: $9,800
- Move-in: $3,500
- Total cash needed: $97,300
- Cash remaining: $89,000 - $97,300 = -$8,300 (shortfall!)
I would need to liquidate my $12,000 investment account, leaving me with only $3,700 cash after closing. No emergency fund.
Option B: 10% down (with PMI)
- Down payment: $42,000
- Closing costs: $9,800
- Move-in: $3,500
- Total cash needed: $55,300
- Cash remaining: $89,000 - $55,300 = $33,700
I’d have $33,700 liquid cash after closing—enough for emergency fund ($18,000) plus buffer ($15,700).
The calculator at Middle Credit Score showed me exact monthly costs and total expenses for both scenarios.
Down Payment Calculator: Monthly Payment Comparison
Option A: 20% down ($84,000), no PMI
- Loan amount: $336,000
- Interest rate: 6.75%
- Monthly P&I: $2,179
- Property taxes: $420/month
- Homeowners insurance: $165/month
- PMI: $0
- Total monthly payment: $2,764
Option B: 10% down ($42,000), with PMI
- Loan amount: $378,000
- Interest rate: 6.875% (0.125% higher for 10% down)
- Monthly P&I: $2,488
- Property taxes: $420/month
- Homeowners insurance: $165/month
- PMI: $192/month (0.61% annually)
- Total monthly payment: $3,265
Monthly cost difference: $3,265 - $2,764 = $501/month more for 10% down
Over 10 years (typical PMI duration): $501 × 120 months = $60,120 extra cost.
On the surface, 20% down wins financially. But the calculator only tells part of the story.
What the Calculator Doesn’t Show: Emergency Fund Value
Scenario A reality (20% down):
- Cash after closing: $3,700
- Emergency fund: $3,700 (1.2 months expenses, far below 6-month goal)
- Financial stress: High
- Forced to use credit for emergencies
Scenario B reality (10% down):
- Cash after closing: $33,700
- Emergency fund: $18,000 (6 months expenses) + $15,700 buffer
- Financial stress: Low
- Can handle unexpected expenses
Value of emergency fund (Year 1-3 real scenarios):
Year 1: HVAC repair ($5,200)
- 20% down path: Would need 0% credit card or HELOC at 9.5% = $410 cost to finance
- 10% down path: Paid cash from emergency fund, no interest
Year 2: Job layoff (3 months)
- 20% down path: $2,764/month mortgage = $8,292 total, forced to use unemployment + credit cards = high stress
- 10% down path: $3,265/month mortgage = $9,795 total, covered by emergency fund = manageable stress
Year 3: Medical deductible ($4,800)
- 20% down path: Payment plan at 8% interest = $320 interest cost
- 10% down path: Paid cash from buffer, no interest
Total emergency costs avoided with 10% down: $410 + $320 = $730 direct savings, plus immeasurable stress reduction
The $33,700 cash cushion had real value beyond just sitting in savings.
Opportunity Cost Analysis: Investing the $42,000 Difference
What if I kept the $42,000 difference invested instead of putting it toward down payment?
Investment scenario:
- Amount: $42,000 (difference between 10% and 20% down)
- Average return: 8% annually (conservative stock market average)
- Time horizon: 10 years
- Future value: $42,000 × (1.08)^10 = $90,665
Compare this to PMI cost:
- PMI paid: $192/month × 120 months = $23,040
- Investment growth: $90,665 - $42,000 = $48,665 gain
- Net advantage: $48,665 gain - $23,040 PMI = $25,625 better off investing
Even after paying $23,040 in PMI, investing the $42,000 difference and earning 8% returns left me $25,625 ahead after 10 years.
But what about the extra $42,000 in mortgage interest?
Good point. The larger loan ($378K vs $336K) meant more interest paid:
- Larger loan interest (10 years): $225,800
- Smaller loan interest (10 years): $201,200
- Extra interest cost: $24,600
Total extra costs for 10% down:
- PMI: $23,040
- Extra interest: $24,600
- Total: $47,640
Investment returns offset:
- Investment gains: $48,665
- Extra costs: $47,640
- Net advantage: $1,025 for 10% down strategy
The math was nearly break-even, but the 10% down + invest strategy won by $1,025 over 10 years—while providing massive financial flexibility.
PMI Removal Strategy (It’s Not Forever)
The calculator showed PMI lasting 10+ years at normal payment rates. But I had a plan to remove it much faster:
PMI removal requirements:
- Automatic removal: 78% LTV (loan paid down to $327,600 on $420K home)
- Requested removal: 80% LTV (loan paid down to $336,000)
- Requires on-time payments for 2+ years
My accelerated PMI removal plan:
- Monthly payment: $3,265 regular payment
- Extra principal: $300/month
- Total payment: $3,565/month
With extra principal payments:
- Reach 80% LTV: 6.2 years (instead of 10+ years)
- PMI paid: $192 × 74 months = $14,208 (instead of $23,040)
- Savings: $8,832 versus keeping PMI full term
Alternative strategy: Use investment gains to pay down loan
- After 5 years, investment worth: $61,733
- Use to pay down mortgage reaching 80% LTV
- Remove PMI at year 5
- PMI paid: $192 × 60 months = $11,520
By treating PMI as temporary (not permanent), the total cost dropped from $23,040 to $11,520-$14,208 depending on strategy.
Credit Score Impact on PMI Rates
Using credit score tools, I learned PMI rates vary by credit score:
My PMI rate at 718 credit score:
- PMI: 0.61% annually
- Monthly: $192
PMI at different credit scores (same 10% down, $378K loan):
- 680 credit: 0.85% PMI = $268/month
- 700 credit: 0.72% PMI = $227/month
- 720 credit: 0.58% PMI = $183/month
- 740+ credit: 0.50% PMI = $158/month
I saved $76/month versus 680 credit score ($268 - $192) = $9,120 over 10 years just from having 718 credit instead of 680.
Before choosing 10% down, I worked on improving my credit from 692 to 718 (26-point improvement) saving me $35/month in PMI ($227 - $192).
Credit improvement strategy:
- Paid down credit cards from 48% to 8% utilization
- Disputed one incorrect late payment (removed)
- Avoided new credit applications for 4 months
- Result: 692 → 718 credit = $35/month PMI savings = $4,200 over 10 years
The down payment calculator combined with credit optimization gave me the best of both worlds.
When 20% Down Makes More Sense
Despite my positive experience with 10% down, the 20% down strategy is better for certain situations:
Choose 20% down if:
You have sufficient savings beyond down payment
- Can put 20% down AND keep 6-month emergency fund
- Have additional investment accounts untouched
- My situation: Would have depleted all savings
PMI rates are high due to lower credit score
- Below 680 credit = 0.85%+ PMI = $268+/month
- Makes 20% down more attractive
- Work on credit first, or accept higher 20% down value
You’re in a declining market
- Risk of going underwater (owing more than home worth)
- 20% equity cushion provides protection
- 10% down riskier if values drop 10-15%
You’re buying at the top of your budget
- Already stretching to afford payment
- Can’t absorb extra $192-$268/month PMI cost
- Better to buy less expensive home
You’re close to retirement (within 10 years)
- Want lower monthly obligation
- Less time to benefit from investment strategy
- Prefer stability over optimization
Interest rates are very low (under 4%)
- Harder to beat guaranteed savings with investments
- My 6.875% rate easier to beat with 8% stock returns
- At 3.5% rate, advantage shrinks dramatically
When 10% Down + PMI Works (My Scenario)
Choose 10% down with PMI if:
Preserves adequate emergency fund
- Can keep 6-month expenses in cash after closing
- Provides financial safety net
- Worth the PMI cost for peace of mind
You’re young with long time horizon
- I was 29 when I bought
- 30+ years to benefit from investing the difference
- Time to remove PMI early through extra payments
You have investment discipline
- Will actually invest the $42K difference (not spend it)
- Can beat PMI cost with investment returns
- I automated investing and treated it seriously
Credit score is 700+ for low PMI rates
- Under 0.65% PMI = $205/month or less
- More manageable cost
- Lower credit scores make 20% down more attractive
You’re in an appreciating market
- Home value growth helps reach 80% LTV faster
- My home appreciated 8% in 2 years = $33,600 gain
- Accelerated PMI removal timeline
You value liquidity and flexibility
- Career changes, opportunities, life events
- $42,000 liquid worth more than locked equity
- Can always pay down mortgage later if desired
3-Year Results: Was 10% Down the Right Choice?
Three years after purchase:
Home equity position:
- Home value: $453,600 (8% appreciation)
- Mortgage balance: $365,200 (paid down $12,800 + extra payments)
- Equity: $88,400
- LTV: 80.5% (almost at PMI removal!)
Financial position:
- Emergency fund: $22,000 (maintained and grew)
- Investment account: $67,300 (started with $42K extra + continued contributions)
- PMI paid to date: $6,912 ($192 × 36 months)
- Net worth increase: Strong
If I’d chosen 20% down:
- Home equity: $88,400 (same appreciation)
- Emergency fund: $8,500 (slowly rebuilt from $3,700)
- Investment account: $18,000 (couldn’t contribute as much)
- PMI paid: $0
- Net worth increase: Lower
Total wealth comparison:
- 10% down strategy: $88,400 equity + $22,000 cash + $67,300 investments = $177,700
- 20% down strategy: $88,400 equity + $8,500 cash + $18,000 investments = $114,900
- Advantage: $62,800 more wealth with 10% down strategy
The 10% down strategy created $62,800 more total wealth after just 3 years, despite paying $6,912 in PMI.
The Bottom Line: Calculator Shows Context Matters
The down payment calculator showed me that PMI costs $23,040 over 10 years. That number scared me initially.
But when I modeled my complete financial situation, the math revealed:
- Emergency fund preservation: Invaluable
- Investment opportunity: $48,665 gains on $42K invested
- Net advantage: $25,625 (investment gains minus PMI and extra interest)
- Financial flexibility: Priceless during job loss and emergencies
Choosing 10% down with PMI was the right decision for my situation despite conventional wisdom saying “always avoid PMI.”
The key was using comprehensive calculators at financial planning tools that showed total costs, connecting with advisors at Browse Lenders who understood my goals, and having a plan to remove PMI within 5-7 years through extra payments or strategic refinancing once I built sufficient equity.
Don’t let PMI fear force you into financial stress. Model your specific situation, consider emergency fund needs, and choose the down payment strategy that supports your total financial wellness—not just the lowest monthly payment.
Have questions about down payment strategies and PMI decisions? Contact our team at support@browselenders.com for personalized analysis.
Online Mortgage Calculator®
Powered by Browse Lenders® — the nation's trusted mortgage and credit-education platform.
Ready to browse loan officers?
Compare licensed professionals in our directory — education first, no pressure.